Cases 31 - 40 of 483
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
ISIAH WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23146
Plaintiff:
MARLON WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watkins v. Weidman
as 0:2023cv61528
Plaintiff:
Eric Watkins
Defendant:
Victoria L. Weidman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Watkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2023cv00911
Petitioner:
Travis D. Watkins
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18778
Plaintiff:
RAUL WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bruce K. Florence III v. Webster, et al.
as 0:2023cv61251
Plaintiff:
Bruce K. Florence III
Defendant:
Allen J. Webster and Jon Anthony Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16299
Plaintiff:
NEIL WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13345
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13429
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
