Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Antonetti v. Cox et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Defendant:
C.C. Adams, R. Aranas, Avendano and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpino v. Cherry et al
as 2:2017cv02266
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Judge Janet J Berry, Chief Justice Michael A Cherry, Nathan Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Arpino v. Cherry et al
as 3:2017cv00527
Petitioner:
John Francis Arpino
Respondent:
Judge Janet J Berry, Chief Justice Michael A Cherry, Nathan Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pathak v. Spadaro et al
as 2:2016cv02096
Defendant:
Sunil Bhasin, Anjelica Juana Hernandez, David Alan Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Bharat Pathak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Antonetti v. McDaniels et al
as 3:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Defendant:
R. Baker, Baraclough, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Steinheimer, et al
as 3:2016cv00317
Defendant:
Richard A. Gammick, Christopher J. Hicks, Travis Look and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Karl Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00250
Defendant:
Miranda Du, Larry Hicks and Robert Jones
Plaintiff:
Renard T Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Csech v. Moyle et al
as 3:2015cv00615
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Thomas Bittker, Michelle Moses Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Csech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. NDOC et al
as 2:2015cv02246
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Mitchell Hicks-Moses, NDOC and Romchisel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DuShane v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00531
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Sarah Foster, Michelle Hicks-Moses and others
Plaintiff:
Jasen Lynn DuShane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
