Cases 31 - 40 of 157
Montes v. E. Barret Prettyman United States Courthouse
as 1:2019cv07138
Plaintiff:
Francisco Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
E. Barret Prettyman United States Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes v. Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel
as 1:2019cv06687
Plaintiff:
Francisco Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montes v. United States Court of Federal Claims
as 1:2019cv06563
Plaintiff:
Francisco Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Court of Federal Claims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon v. Korte et al
as 3:2019cv03228
Defendant:
Stephen Bradshaw, Jeffrey Korte, Ryan Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. High Bridge Associates, Inc.
as 1:2019cv06240
Defendant:
Higher Bridge Associates, Inc. and High Bridge Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Monte Moore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hanover Insurance Company v. Chicago Ornamental Iron, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05715
Defendant:
Chicago Ornamental Iron, Inc., Enrique Montes and Jonathan Samek
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Montes v. Presence Saint Mary's Elizabeth Medical Center
as 1:2019cv05318
Plaintiff:
Francisco Montes, Jr.
Defendant:
Presence Saint Mary's Elizabeth Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montes v. Saul
as 1:2019cv05294
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Adelina Montes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pendleton v. Village of Skokie et al
as 1:2019cv04183
Defendant:
H. Montes DeOca, Village of Skokie, J.D. Riggs and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Sabens et al
as 3:2019cv00559
Defendant:
Monte Richie, J Sams, IDOC and others
Plaintiff:
King Michael Oliver and Michael Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
