Cases 31 - 40 of 167
Payne v. Corbin
as 7:2021cv00560
Petitioner:
Christopher N. Payne
Respondent:
Clay Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Corbin
as 7:2021cv00540
Petitioner:
Christopher N. Payne
Respondent:
Clay Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Corbin
as 1:2021cv01074
Petitioner:
Christopher N. Payne
Respondent:
Clay Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Saville
as 1:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Christopher N Payne
Defendant:
Jackie Saville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Hudson
as 1:2021cv00835
Plaintiff:
Shawn Richard Payne
Defendant:
Kevin Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Kane et al
as 1:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson Payne
Defendant:
Tana Jones, Clay Corbin, Dana Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aursby v. Richardson et al
as 7:2021cv00339
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Gregory Brian Saathoff, Kyle Thomas Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Aursby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Hudson et al
as 1:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Shawn Payne
Defendant:
Kevin Hudson and Barbara Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Gregory et al
as 1:2021cv00122
Defendant:
G. Payne and Alisa Gregory
Plaintiff:
Charquan M Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
