Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 59
POLK v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv05786
Plaintiff: EARL POLK, SR.
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POLK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51081
Plaintiff: ERNEST POLK
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
POLK v. ACADEMY TANKERS INC.
as 2:2010cv42571
Plaintiff: CHARLES H POLK
Defendant: ACADEMY TANKERS INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
POLK v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv42572
Plaintiff: CHARLES H. POLK
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
POLK v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79615
Plaintiff: WILLIE DANIEL POLK
Defendant: ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POLK et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38564
Plaintiff: EMILE J POLK and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
POLK v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33614
Plaintiff: ERNEST POLK
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
POLK v. YOST We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00309
Petitioner: GREGORY L. POLK
Respondent: JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
POLK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv05416
Plaintiff: LUCIAN POLK
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POLK et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv87197
Plaintiff: FLORENCE POLK
Defendant: RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC, ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?