Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. W.A.R. LLP
as 1:2011mc00283
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS SIMS
Defendant:
W.A.R. LLP
Creditor:
RAY CONNOLLY
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00394
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 8001
SIMS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02287
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE SIMS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOUSTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00711
Plaintiff:
TONEY HOUSTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HELEN MARBERRY, HATTIE SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. D'S SEVEN SERVICES et al
as 1:2009cv00965
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, ANDREW STERN, RODERICK S. BASHIR and others
Defendant:
D'S SEVEN SERVICES and ALEXIS SIMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. SIM-G TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
as 1:2008cv00206
Plaintiff:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
SIM-G TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
