Cases 31 - 40 of 125
Barefield v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Barefield
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Jimenez, Jr. v. Bexar County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 12-51016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RAFAEL JIMENEZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, AMADEO ORTIZ, ROGER DOVALINA and others
Cabalos v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00926
Plaintiff:
Juan Cabalos
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Ortiz
as 5:2012cv00922
Petitioner:
Roberto Garcia
Respondent:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
Justin Burnett
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierson v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00899
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Plaintiff:
Bryan T. Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00898
Plaintiff:
Marcel C. Hughes
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00900
Plaintiff:
LeAndre` V. Hill
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbins v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00895
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dobbins
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00897
Plaintiff:
Ali Mayberry
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
