Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Dinkevich et al v. Aron et al
as 1:2020cv02870
Defendant:
Lloyd L. Hill, Howard W. Koch, Craig R. Ramsey and others
Plaintiff:
David Dinkevich and Ann Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manuel v. Aron et al
as 1:2020cv02456
Defendant:
Adam M. Aron, Kathleen M. Pawlus, Lloyd Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Lorra Manuel
Nominal Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
OWENS-HUBBARD et al v. AMC PHILADELPHIA MILLS 14 et al
as 2:2020cv01034
Defendant:
AMC FRANLIN MILLS MALL 14, AMC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., AMC PHILADELPHIA MILLS 14 and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD HUBBARD and STEPHANIE OWENS-HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Au v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00805
Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andreas Von Der Au
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv09919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos, Sr. v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00331
Plaintiff:
Ramon Trevino Ramos, Sr.
Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenna v. Aron et al
as 1:2019cv09148
Defendant:
Adam M. Aron, Kathleen M. Pawlus, Lloyd Hill and others
Nominal Defendant:
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kenna
Shanklin et al v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03623
Defendant:
JANE DOE, AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., American Multi-Cinema, Inc. d/b/a AMC Theatres Gulf Pointe 30 and others
Plaintiff:
Erica Shelton and Alexis Janae Shanklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
