Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Eliason et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv06232
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc. and AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Plaintiff:
Lindie Lawrence, Amy Eliason and Angela Hueckel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Accor Management US Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv04188
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc., Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) LLC, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Visa Inc., MasterCard Incorporated, Visa International Service Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Scott et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv04063
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Inc., Technocom Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Scott, Carolyn Jewel and George Pontis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Redka v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company et al
as 4:2019cv03442
Plaintiff:
Joseph Redka
Defendant:
AT&T Eligible Former Employee Advantage Medical Program No. 980, UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eric Alvarado v. AT and T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03278
Defendant:
AT and T Services, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Eric Alvarado
Eric Alvarado v. AT and T Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00783
Defendant:
AT and T Services, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Eric Alvarado
Gardner v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01889
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. and Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Dawne Gardner
Dawne Gardner v. ATandT Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01891
Defendant:
AT and T Services, Inc., DOES and Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Plaintiff:
Dawne Gardner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
