Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Trower et al v. Blinken et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jill Trower and Adam Trower
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Review of Judicial Administrative Decision
Mgimbi v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2021cv01511
Plaintiff:
Jules Mgimbi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Kenneth S Madsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Ta v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2021cv01011
Plaintiff:
NGAN TA
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
