Cases 31 - 40 of 41
BURNS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
AMY ELIZABETH BURNS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BRINKMEYER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2011cv00137
Plaintiff:
AMY BRINKMEYER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ORTHO-MCNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL INC, ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LILLY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2010cv00389
Plaintiff:
AMY J LILLY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MARTIN v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BANGOR
as 1:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
AMY MARTIN
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BANGOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON-GEE v. BOYLES et al
as 1:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
AMY JOHNSON-GEE
Defendant:
BRENT BOYLES, RICHARD DAIGLE, NATHAN GRASS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L E et al v. BONGARD et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
L E and R F
Defendant:
AMY BONGARD, TED HALL, JILL FRAME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'CONNOR-SAVERSE v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
MARY P O'CONNOR-SAVERSE
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY , MAURICE OUELLETTE , MICHAEL VITIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EAMES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2009cv00615
Plaintiff:
AMY EAMES
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BIXBY v. MSAD 40 et al
as 2:2008cv00057
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BIXBY
Defendant:
MSAD 40 , AMY SHRIVER and THOMAS SHRIVER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
