Cases 31 - 40 of 42
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Knox v. Scott, et al
as 12-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
WADE SCOTT, OSP FOOD SERVICE MGR., VALERIE WARD and others
Knox v. Scott et al
as 6:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Wade Scott, OSP Food Service Mgr., Valerie Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Morgan, et al
as 12-6017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
JOAN MORGAN, Clinical Coordinator, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, KENNY HOLLOWAY, Director Treatment & Rehabilitation and others
Knox v. Morgan et al
as 5:2011cv01455
Plaintiff:
Antone L A Knox
Defendant:
Joan Morgan, Randall G Workman, Kenny Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Knox v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Pink-Roberts, et al
as 09-7082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CRYSTA PINK-ROBERTS, DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, NEAMYRA RIDDLE and others
Knox v. Sockey et al
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
