Cases 31 - 40 of 114
COFFIN v. WALGREEN, CO. et al
as 2:2017cv04091
Plaintiff:
ANN MARIE COFFIN
Defendant:
WALGREEN, CO. , WALGREEN EASTERN CO. , WALGREENS FAMILIES OF COMPANIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MALACHI et al v. COLASH, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02330
Plaintiff:
MORGAN MALACHI , MALLORI MALACHI and JEREMY GUNN
Defendant:
COLASH, LLC, ANNE MARY RIVERS and R. JAKE SUDDERTH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BABIY et al v. BRYN MAWR TRUST
as 2:2017cv01640
Plaintiff:
P. THEODORE BABIY, ANNE MARIE E. QUINN and DIAMOND DEVELOMNET GROUP
Defendant:
BRYN MAWR TRUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR et al
as 4:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR, All Unknown Owners and Anne Marie Benoski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR et al
as 4:2017cv00537
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR, All Unknown Owners and Anne Marie Benoski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dezinski v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Dezinski
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LYMAN v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2016cv05191
Plaintiff:
KAI LYMAN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MARGARET T. MURPHY and ANNE MARIE B. COYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
