Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Bailey v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00444
Plaintiff: Ari Bailey
Defendant: United States of America, Raymond Holt, Darryl Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 12-2519
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN FOROSTIAK
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00498
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ari Bailey v. Stephen Forostiak, et al
as 11-8093
Plaintiff - Petitioner: ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent: STEPHEN FOROSTIAK, Asbestos Coor. E.P.A., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, BOP Dir., CONNELLY, Asst. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Ari Bailey v. Stephen Forostiak, et al
as 11-3099
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN FOROSTIAK, Asbestos Coor. E.P.A. and AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSN
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 11-8030
Plaintiff - Petitioner: ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent: DELBERT G. SAUERS, Chief D.S.C.C. Grand Praine, TX, T. L. NORWOOD, Reg Dir., CONNELLY, Assist. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 11-2193
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee: DELBERT G. SAUERS, Chief D.S.C.C. Grand Praine, TX, T. L. NORWOOD, Reg Dir., CONNELLY, Assist. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Bailey v. Forostiak et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00577
Plaintiff: Ari Bailey
Defendant: Stephen Forostiak, Harley G. Lappin, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Martinez et al
as 3:2011cv00461
Petitioner: Ari Bailey
Respondent: R Martinez , Isaac Fulwood, Jr. , Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff: Ari Bailey
Defendant: Harley G Lappin, Connelly, Delbert G. Sauers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?