Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Barfield v. Compass Bank
as 3:2014cv02272
Plaintiff:
Penelopi Polly Barfield
Defendant:
Compass Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dueling et al v. Devon Energy Corp. et al
as 4:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Dueling , Tye Dueling , Heath E. Barfield and others
Defendant:
Devon Energy Corp. and Devon Energy Production Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barfield v. United States Of America
as 7:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Christina Rene Barfield
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heard v. Horan et al
as 3:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
David L Horan, B Avant Edenfield, W Leon Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Stephens
as 1:2013cv00649
Petitioner:
James Henry Barfield
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barfield v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv03155
Petitioner:
James Henry Barfield
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barfield v. William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02740
Petitioner:
Daniel Walter Barfield
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barfield v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02739
Petitioner:
Daniel Walter Barfield
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barfield v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02737
Petitioner:
Daniel Walter Barfield
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barfield v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02742
Petitioner:
Daniel Walter Barfield
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
