Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 116
CHAMBERS v. FORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00001
Plaintiff: ROY CHAMBERS, JR
Defendant: DEPUTY WARDEN COFFEE, UNIT MANAGER JOHN DOE, DEPUTY WARDEN THORNTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00479
Plaintiff: JAMES JONES
Defendant: WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. WARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00453
Defendant: JACK SAULS, ARETHA SMITH, RODNEY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff: ASHLEY DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00422
Defendant: MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH P FOWLKES, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, DOCTOR FOGUM and others
Plaintiff: BRYAN L VIZION JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv04764
Defendant: Jack Sauls, Aretha Smith, Rodney Jackson and others
Plaintiff: Ashley Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. WICKER et al
as 5:2020cv00427
Plaintiff: JOHN LAMAR SIMPSON
Defendant: DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE, Warden BENJAMIN FORD and DEPUTY WARDEN JOSH WICKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Adams v. Benjamin Ford
as 20-13641
Respondent / Appellee: BENJAMIN FORD
Petitioner / Appellant: RONALD DAVID ADAMS
Jones v. Ford et al
as 1:2020cv04293
Defendant: Joseph P. Fowlkes, John & Jane Does, Dr. Fogum and others
Plaintiff: Bryan L. (Vizion) Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00374
Plaintiff: JAMES JONES
Defendant: WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITT v. FORD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00375
Plaintiff: DAVID EARL BRITT
Defendant: WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?