Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Niemic v. Mass. Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv11402
Plaintiff:
Keith Niemic
Defendant:
Mass. Dept. of Correction, Luis Spencer, Bruce Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Spencer et al
as 4:2013cv40060
Plaintiff:
DeCarlo Monte Holmes
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer and Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Spencer et al
as 4:2013cv40046
Defendant:
Luis Spencer, Bruce Gelb, Osvaldo Vidal and others
Plaintiff:
Madinson Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Gelb
as 1:2013cv10306
Petitioner:
Darryl Scott
Respondent:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Gelb
as 1:2013cv10263
Petitioner:
Hubert Lee Smith
Respondent:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Spencer et al
as 1:2013cv10083
Plaintiff:
Shekeira Williams and Donald Williams
Defendant:
Luis S. Spencer, Bruce Gelb, Osvaldo Vidal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Gelb
as 1:2012cv12340
Petitioner:
Andre Walker
Respondent:
Bruce Gelb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12210
Plaintiff:
Rashad Akeem Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Dan Lachance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheed v. Newry et al
as 1:2012cv12094
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Carmen Newry, Bartholomew Nelson, Patricia Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
