Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Newcomb Taysom v. O'bama et al
as 4:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicola Jo Newcomb Taysom
Defendant:
Barack O'bama, Joseph Biden, US Cabinet Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long et al v. CCA Western Properties Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
Seth Taylor Long
Defendant:
CCA Western Properties Inc, Wade Falconberg, Carly Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. OSHA et al
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Martin
Defendant:
OSHA, Keith Ball, Kevin Kilp and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hagen v. Myers et al
as 4:2012cv00644
Plaintiff:
Brian Hagen , Nancy Allman , Dale R Bartlett and others
Defendant:
Conrad Myers, DBSI Liquidating Trust, James R. Zazzali and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Zazzali v. Swenson et al
as 1:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
James R. Zazzali
Defendant:
Douglas L. Swenson , Charles Hassard , John M. Mayeron and others
Cross_claimant:
Bryan S. Mick and Mick & Associates PC LLO
Cross_defendant:
Gary Bringhurst , John Doe 1-50, Charles Hassard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Diggs v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Diggs
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Thomas Baccus, Jr
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beeson v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Milo Beeson
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGonigal v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00178
Petitioner:
Bryan McGonigal
Respondent:
Johanna Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
