Cases 31 - 40 of 2,112
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sewell v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Larry Gene Sewell
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wayne Butler, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Scott Lee, Brian Davenport, City of Cleburne Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jackson v. Collier
as 4:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Bobby Lumpkin, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aromaye v. Moynihan et al
as 3:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Bryan Deangelo Aromaye
Defendant:
Brian Moynihan d/b/a Bank of America, N.A., Dermot McDonogh d/b/a Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and One More Recovery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
