Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,360
Desert Protection Society v. Haaland, et al.
as 23-4263
Plaintiff / Appellant: DESERT PROTECTION SOCIETY
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, KAREN MOURITSEN, in her official capacity as State Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management for California, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: EAGLE CREST ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
Willamette Riverkeeper et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 6:2023cv01631
Plaintiff: Willamette Riverkeeper, Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management and Dennis Teitzel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wild Horse Education et al v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00568
Plaintiff: Wild Horse Education and Laura Leigh
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Director Tracy Stone-Manning, Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2023cv00491
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant: United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Colvin & Son, LLC et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 3:2023cv00505
Plaintiff: Colvin & Son, LLC and Stone Cabin Ranch, LLC
Defendant: Deb Haaland, in her official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Tracy Stone-Manning in her official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, Jon Raby in his official capacity as the Nevada State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3627
Plaintiff / Appellant: SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. United States Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff: Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, United States Bureau of Land Management and Christina Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
as 1:2023cv02887
Plaintiff: PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Not Classified By Court: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Defendant: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
as 1:2023cv00115
Plaintiff: AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN
Defendant: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?