Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Pelayo v. Collins, et al.
as 1:2015cv00862
Plaintiff:
Martin Pelayo
Defendant:
Collins, Kemp, C L Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Phillips
as 2:2015cv00581
Plaintiff:
Robey Kurt Hairston
Defendant:
C. L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giovanni Espinoza v. C & L Refrigeration Corporation et al
as 8:2014cv01431
Defendant:
C & L Refrigeration Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Espinoza
Dowell v. Trujillo #1712570 et al
as 3:2014cv02068
Plaintiff:
Donald Dowell
Defendant:
M. Trujillo #1712570, C. L. Hubbard #1712036 and M. Oliveros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ning Li et al v. C&L Transport et al
as 2:2014cv02952
Defendant:
C&L Transport, Does, Kennesaw Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ning Li and Jiuhong Liang
Henry Puckett v. G Amaya et al
as 5:2014cv00717
Defendant:
G Amaya, G Amaya, F C Covello and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Puckett
The Board of Trustees et al v. C & L Coating, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01707
Defendant:
C & L Coating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fund for Northern California, Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California and others
The Board of Trustees et al v. C & L Coating, Inc.
as 2:2014mc00088
Defendant:
C & L Coating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fund for Northern California, Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California and others
Matthew Woods v. Southern California Edison Company et al
as 5:2014cv00110
Defendant:
F Duane Ackerman, Robert L Adler, Allstate Insurance Company and others
SCE:
Southern California Edison Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Woods
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
