Cases 31 - 40 of 161
VANDERPLOEG v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv02970
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
DEBRA VANDERPLOEG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01857
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HILL
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRESCENT BANK & TRUST v. C.R. LOUGHEAD, INC.
as 2:2017cv05128
Plaintiff:
CRESCENT BANK & TRUST
Defendant:
C.R. LOUGHEAD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IDELUCA v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01355
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE IDELUCA
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUESS et al v. COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04622
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ALAN SUESS and C.R. STELLING INSURANCE AGENCY
Defendant:
COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. , BROADWAY ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC and FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORDON v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04553
Plaintiff:
HARRY P. GORDON
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
WROTEN et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04546
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WROTEN and CAROL WROTEN
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dortch v. Sabol et al
as 3:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Frank Dortch
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, York County Prison, Prime Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUNSAK v. KIPROFF, M.D. et al
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
NANCY ELIZABETH KUNSAK
Defendant:
PAUL M. KIPROFF, M.D., RAYMOND L. BENZA, M.D., ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DONIGAN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv04889
Plaintiff:
DONIGAN and MICHAEL A. DONIGAN
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC, BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
