Cases 31 - 40 of 276
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01654
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Bivens et al
as 1:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown and Michael J. Brown
Defendant:
Bivens, Roxbury C.I. Medical Dept., Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01332
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Ryan W. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Carlos D. Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Kinney
as 1:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Carlos Whitaker
Defendant:
Ms. Kinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinley v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Gary T. McKinley
Respondent:
Carlos D. Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Midget v. Purdue Pharma LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Anthony Calvin Midget
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LLC, Central Booking and Intake Center, Kroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rueda et al v. Gilbane Building Company et al
as 8:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
ROXANA RUEDA, CARLOS TORRICO, FERNANDO LESCANO and others
Defendant:
GILBANE BUILDING COMPANY, P&D CONTRACTORS, LLC, MAXIMUM BUILDERS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Causion v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv00222
Petitioner:
Shannon Causion
Respondent:
Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
