Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Hamilton v. UPS, et al
as 1:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
UPS and CVS/Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States of America, State Of Texas and Harris County Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Zanders et al
as 1:2011cv00005
Defendant:
Walter A Dennis, Willie M Zanders and Rosemary Dennis
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States of America and Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Hamilton v. Dir, TDCJ
as 5:2010cv00158
Petitioner:
Lee Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Dir, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Arthur et al
as 4:2010cv02709
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Harry C Arthur , Law Office of Harry C Arthur and Marine Building LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hamilton v. Magnus-Lawson et al
as 4:2010cv02220
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Samuel Benjamin Magnus-Lawson , D Bret Edwards, Christus St Joseph Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hamilton v. Freeman et al
as 1:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Antoine L Freeman, Edward McCray and Joyce M Guy
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hamilton et al v. Triple D Security Corporation
as 5:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton, Thomas Robertson, Christopher Ross and others
Defendant:
Triple D Security Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - Fair Labor Standards
Hamilton v. Magnus-Lawson et al
as 1:2009cv00954
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Samuel Benjamin Magnus-Lawson, D Bret Edwards, Christus St Joseph Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
