Cases 31 - 39 of 39
David Thomas v. United States District Court f
as 10-72409
:
In re: DAVID LEE THOMAS
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT and others
Jean Howell v. Christopher Boyle, et al
as 10-35038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEAN MARIE HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER DAVID BOYLE and CITY OF BEAVERTON
Jean Howell v. Christopher Boyle, et al
as 09-36153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEAN MARIE HOWELL
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DAVID BOYLE and CITY OF BEAVERTON
Vang v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2009cv00928
Plaintiff:
Hao Xeng Vang
Defendant:
City of Beaverton, City of Beaverton, Jason Buelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Stewart
Defendant:
City of Beaverton, Michael Hanada and Christopher Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
James Robinson v. Washington County, et al
as 09-35254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON COUNTY, State of Oregon, SHAWN BLALACH, Washington County Police Officer, CITY OF BEAVERTON and others
Hadley v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hadley
Defendant:
City of Beaverton, Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon and Christopher Freeman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Howell v. Boyle et al
as 3:2008cv00727
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Howell
Defendant:
Christopher David Boyle and City of Beaverton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alan Hall
Defendant:
City of Beaverton, Beaverton Police Department, Rich Rayniak and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
