Cases 31 - 40 of 69
WELLS v. RAYMOND SOBINA/MICHAEL CURLEY et al
as 1:2010cv00280
Petitioner:
RICHARD K. WELLS
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA/MICHAEL CURLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards #354460 v. Curley et al
as 2:2010cv01481
Petitioner:
DONALD ROY EDWARDS
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56109
Plaintiff:
CURLEY WOODS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Holder v. Curley
as 1:2010cv02236
Petitioner:
Glynn A. Holder
Respondent:
Michael Curley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Otto v. Curley et al
as 1:2010cv02193
Petitioner:
Steven D. Otto
Respondent:
Michael Curley, Muskegon Correctional Facility and The attorney general of the state of pa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2010cv05569
Petitioner:
RICHARD . PARKER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELHIA, CO. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KERRY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51087
Plaintiff:
CURLEY KERRY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Drawbaugh v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv01929
Petitioner:
Michael Drawbaugh
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard, Michael W. Curley and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stubbs v. Curley et al
as 1:2010cv01849
Petitioner:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Respondent:
Michael Curley and Attorney General of the State of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HATTEN v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80617
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HATTEN and CURLEY M. HATTEN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
