Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Carroll v. USA
as 0:2016cv00137
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dennis L. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Howard v. County of Carrollton Kentucky
as 3:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Howard and Daniel Allen Howard
Defendant:
County of Carrollton Kentucky, Carroll County Fiscal Court, Carroll County, Ky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Carroll County Fiscal Court et al
as 3:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Watts
Defendant:
Carroll County Fiscal Court and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowen et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerald Bowen , Joan Bossert , Donna Bostick and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Westfield Insurance Company v. Arnold et al
as 5:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Casey Arnold , Mediport, LLC , Timothy Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carroll v. SSA
as 0:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ora Ann Carroll
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carroll v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00222
Plaintiff:
Donna A. Carroll
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , PATI Real Estate Holdings, LLC and Rescap Liquidating Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nunn v. USA et al
as 3:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Roderick Nunn
Defendant:
USA, Marc Bryant, Carroll County Commanwealth Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Margalit Corber et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Margalit Corber , Rene Caro , Steve Dantzler and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
