Cases 31 - 40 of 175
Cortez-Gomez v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cortez-Gomez
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, County of Kankakee, Illinois, Michael Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portalatin v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2021cv02201
Plaintiff:
Johnny Portalatin
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Michael Downey and Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2021cv02200
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Brown
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, Michael Downey and Chad Kolitwenzew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roddis v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 3:2021cv03158
Plaintiff:
Ryan Matthew Roddis
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Michael Downey and Jerome Combs Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurtado-Meza v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
Mario Hurtado-Meza
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, . Woods, Nick .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2021cv02173
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Richard Wong, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Downey et al
as 2:2021cv02048
Defendant:
Robert Schultz, Jeremy Most, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob P Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bode v. Kolitwenzew
as 1:2021cv00032
Respondent:
Chad Kolitwenzew
Petitioner:
United Sates of America, Ayodele Bode and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rocha-Sanchez v. Kolitwenzew
as 2:2020cv02361
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew
Plaintiff:
Irbin U Rocha-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02362
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
