Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Smith v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv01115
Plaintiff:
Darryl Smith
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbins v. Chicago Police Dept et al
as 1:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cobbins
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept and WGN News
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruffin v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Plaintiff:
David Ruffin
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Eddie Johnson, R. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv06088
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Booth
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Chicago States Attorney, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Chicago Police Dept Sex Offender Unit et al
as 1:2017cv05966
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hill
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept Sex Offender Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv05906
Plaintiff:
Keith A West
Defendant:
Chicago Police Dept., Officer Callahan, Officer Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. City of Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv05740
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Nelson
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept., Sergeant Boffo, Sergeant Bucki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henderson et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv05620
Plaintiff:
Lithia Henderson, Marshalla Kelly and Marshall Henderson
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, 911 Call Center and Chicago Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Palatine Police Dept et al
as 1:2017cv05118
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hill
Defendant:
Palatine Police Dept, Det Ericksen, Det Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roby v. City of Chicago, IL. Chicago Police Dept. 3rd District
as 1:2017cv04833
Plaintiff:
Alfred H. Roby
Defendant:
City of Chicago, IL. Chicago Police Dept. 3rd District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
