Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Cabassa v. Ostheimer et al
as 3:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
Francisco Cabassa
Defendant:
John Ostheimer, Cindy, Shron Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halloran & Sage LLP v. USA et al
as 3:2015cv01534
Plaintiff:
Halloran & Sage LLP
Defendant:
USA, William P. Loftus and Cindy L. Karen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Halloran & Sage LLP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE) et al
as 3:2015cv01529
Plaintiff:
Halloran & Sage LLP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE), William P. Loftus and Cindy L. Karen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michalski v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Michalski
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Andino, Jennien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Vazquez v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01866
Plaintiff:
Cindy Vazquez
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: MDL 2478 In Re: Convergent Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Cerilli v. Malloy et al
as 3:2013cv01847
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Danne P. Malloy, Scott Erfe, Bate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammersley v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2013cv01477
Plaintiff:
Cindy Hammersley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Laseter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01124
Plaintiff:
Cindy G. Laseter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Thompson v. Esserman et al
as 3:2013cv01059
Plaintiff:
Robert Thompson
Defendant:
Dean Esserman, Johnson, J. Murpht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
