Cases 31 - 40 of 418
Rushon v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2023cv10239
Plaintiff:
Vernell Rushon
Defendant:
City of Detroit, James Clark Davis III and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv13072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
v. City of Detroit
as 2:2022cv12997
Defendant:
City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennebrew v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2022cv12998
Plaintiff:
Michael Kennebrew
Defendant:
City of Detroit, JOHN DOE, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12992
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Unique Sims
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Tyler Scott Alene, Janelle Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harris v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2022cv12967
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Detroit, JeJuan Officer Police Jetter, Michael Dubac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cruz v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12911
Plaintiff:
Julian Cruz
Defendant:
City of Detroit, John Doe and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sharpe v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12783
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharpe
Defendant:
City of Detroit, City of Grosse Pointe Park, Anthony Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Land v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2022cv12672
Plaintiff:
Ian Lamar Land
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Ryan Ruloff, Matthew Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
