Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Rodriguez v. Hunt et al
as 6:2018cv01640
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Faith McCready, Timothy Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar T. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00320
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DePaul Industries v. City of Eugene
as 3:2018mc00102
Defendant:
City of Eugene
Plaintiff:
DePaul Industries
McLane v. Salsbury et al
as 6:2017cv01817
Defendant:
City of Eugene and Sgt. Salsbury
Plaintiff:
Michael McLane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bemis v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2017cv01567
Plaintiff:
Tamala Bemis
Defendant:
City of Eugene and Brad Hanneman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGowan et al v. Stutesman et al
as 6:2017cv00424
Plaintiff:
Connor Babb, Kaylee Babb, Lee Babb and others
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Jane Doe Call Taker, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rintalan v. City of Eugene Municipal et al
as 6:2016cv02404
Defendant:
City of Eugene Municipal, City of Springfield Police Dept., Eugene Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Rintalan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johns v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2016cv00907
Defendant:
Betsy Jean Castleton, City of Eugene, Yolanda Conner and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cosby v. The City of Eugene
as 6:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Mark Cosby
Defendant:
The City of Eugene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benafel v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 6:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Benafel
Defendant:
George Brown, City of Eugene, Mike Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
