Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Sushak v. City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sushak
Defendant:
City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Anthony Skok, Chris Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Rhodes v. Jeffrey Pittard, et al
as 11-5575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN RHODES
Defendant:
JEFFREY PITTARD, ECLIPSE MARKETING INC. and ORKIN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MURFREESBORO, dba Murfreesboro Police and TAD SCOTT
Polson v. The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Floyd D. Polson
Defendant:
The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee and Trey Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chilton et al v. The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
Roger F. Chilton, Roger F. Chilton, Roger F. Chilton and others
Defendant:
The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, The City of Murfreesboro Police Department, Carl Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bockoven v. Watts et al
as 3:2009cv00802
Plaintiff:
David Kyle Bockoven
Defendant:
Carl Watts, John Doe, Murfreesboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rhodes v. City of Murfreesboro et al
as 3:2009cv00780
Plaintiff:
Martin Rhodes
Defendant:
City of Murfreesboro and Tad Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Verge v. City of Murfreesboro et al
as 3:2008cv01230
Plaintiff:
Kenetha Verge
Defendant:
City of Murfreesboro, Brad Hobbs, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Davis v. City of Murfreesboro
as 08-6495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MURFREESBORO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
