Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Pluhar v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
as 2:2016cv00669
Petitioner:
Timothy Pluhar
Respondent:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grable v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
as 3:2016cv00273
Petitioner:
Barret Grable
Defendant:
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clinton v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Complex
as 2:2016cv00573
Petitioner:
Marvin Clinton
Respondent:
Warden Southeastern Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
as 1:2016cv00647
Petitioner:
Stanley Brown
Respondent:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
as 3:2015cv00165
Petitioner:
Christopher M Russell
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zipline Logistics, LLC v. Powers & Stinson, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Zipline Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Powers & Stinson, Inc. , James Annestedt , Complexity, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Turner
as 2:2014cv01908
Petitioner:
Tyrone E. Johnson, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gillette Company v. Simplifying Complex Spaces LLC
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gillette Company
Defendant:
Simplifying Complex Spaces, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dorsey v. Duffey
as 2:2014cv00158
Petitioner:
Richard Dorsey
Defendant:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorsey v. Duffey
as 1:2014cv00137
Petitioner:
Richard Dorsey
Defendant:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
