Cases 31 - 40 of 114
Marshall v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 8:2011cv01106
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Prison Optometric Services, Inc, Santana Nottage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Correctional Medical Services Inc.
as 1:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurt v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 8:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hurt
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Janice Gilmore and Michelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Catherine et al
as 8:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
Roland Mitchell
Defendant:
Catherine, Tessema and Correctional Medical Service, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Warden
as 1:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Maurice B. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Joubert , Colin Ottey , Correctional Medical Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Winford Tracy Justice
Defendant:
Kathleen Green , Getachew , Paul Matera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Maynard et al
as 8:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Dept of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrow-El v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
William Marrow-El
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc. , John Doe and Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Warden
as 1:2011cv00040
Plaintiff:
Damon Dickerson
Defendant:
Warden and Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Arnaout et al
as 1:2010cv03160
Plaintiff:
Monte A. Ingram
Defendant:
Majd Arnaout, Steven Bray, Christine Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
