Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Perez et al v. County of Marin
as 3:2018cv04938
Plaintiff:
Jill Maier, Alicia Balencia, Laura Estrada-Shepherd and others
Defendant:
County of Marin and County of Marin Jail
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
The Alliance for Communication, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1221
Petitioner:
The City of Portland, Maine, Alliance for Community Media, City of Palo Alto, California and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Jane Doe v. Henry Wirta, Jr., et al
as 19-16428
Defendant / Appellee:
PAULINE TEMPERANI, HENRY A. WIRTA, Jr., SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MARIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae:
LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
County of San Mateo, CA, et al v. Peabody Energy Corporation
as 19-1767
Debtor:
In re: Peabody Energy Corporation
Appellant:
County of Marin, California, City of Imperial Beach, California and County of San Mateo, California
Appellee:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Not Yet Classified:
Office of U.S. Trustee
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
American Public Power Assoc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70339
Petitioner:
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Eugene, Oregon, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70344
Intervenor:
CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, FLORIDA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA, CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON and CITY OF BOWIE, MARYLAND
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
