Cases 31 - 40 of 128
WATSON v. VETERANS HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF
as 1:2020cv00510
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Defendant:
VETERANS HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 2702
MOZIE v. RSC ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED
as 1:2020cv00386
Plaintiff:
CURTIS MOZIE and ARDRENETTE WILLIS
Defendant:
RSC ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS et al v. STEPHENS et al
as 1:2020cv00339
Plaintiff:
MAYA BROOKS, JANICE CURTIS and KEISHA WHITLOCK
Defendant:
KARL STEPHENS and METROPOLITAN PROCESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00290
Not Classified By Court:
CURTIS MOZIE, RSC ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED and ARDRENETTE WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GABBIDON v. STANLEY PEARLMAN ENTERPRISES et al
as 1:2019cv03219
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gabbidon
Defendant:
David Fye, Stanley Pearlman Enterprises and STANLEY PEARLMAN ENTERPRISES doing business as CONGRESSIONAL SEAFOOD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv02714
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2019cv02387
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KENNEDY et al v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2019cv01720
Defendant:
DAVID FRANTZ, ESTATE OF JL CHESNUTT, DAVID BRODERICK and others
Plaintiff:
COREY LEA and WILLIE CHARLES KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WATSON v. BOU et al
as 1:2019cv01200
Defendant:
VCRT TRUST OF COLOMBIA MARYLAND, EDWARD BOU and STEPHEN BOU
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE WATSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
