Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Wetzel v. Swartz et al
as 2:2014cv02527
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Richard A. Swartz, Malise Prieto and Eileen Chatellier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2014cv02841
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Scott Cottrell, Chris Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2013cv06200
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetzel v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2013cv06201
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetzel v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv05913
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetzel v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv05799
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wetzel v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv05484
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Robert C Tanner, Matthew Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wetzel v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2013cv02420
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Wetzel
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Ronny Nail, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wetzel v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2013cv04741
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wetzel v. Gamble et al
as 2:2013cv02485
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Matthew D. Gamble, Robert C Tanner, Michael Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
