Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Young v. Revell et al
as 5:2018cv03215
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Sara Revell
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2018cv02341
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
William Edwards
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Young v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2018cv03021
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Sara Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DocuFreedom Inc. v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2017cv02706
Plaintiff:
DocuFreedom Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Karen McFadden
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Young v. Revell et al
as 5:2017cv03175
Defendant:
Timothy Doyle Young, Sara Revell and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2017cv03131
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Department of Justice and Administrative Remedy Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riley v. Edwards et al
as 5:2017cv03118
Plaintiff:
Tessa Ann Riley
Defendant:
Susie Edwards, Deborah Monday, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Winter et al
as 5:2017cv03099
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Richard Winter, Kelee Dell, Christopher Synsvoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2017cv03088
Plaintiff:
Don Alton Harper
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Kansas Department of Revenue, Division of Taxation et al
as 5:2017cv04037
Plaintiff:
Sam Fields
Defendant:
Ronnie D.M. Faircloth, Federal Housing Finance Agency, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
