Cases 31 - 40 of 138
McFadden v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dan McFadden, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hopkins-Dukes et al v. Zinke et al
as 5:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
Amos A Hopkins-Dukes and Steven Geronimo Hopkins
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, Dan Deerinwater, Terry Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Oostema et al
as 5:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dean M Oostema , Talieh D Oostema , Bernadette Rouhani and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Lint et al v. Bryant et al
as 5:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
Elijah Mearl Lint and Willard L Reupert
Defendant:
Jason Bryant, ML D Louthlan, FNU Denton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson v. Tollette et al
as 6:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Susan Fredrickson
Defendant:
Dan Tollette and United States Department Agriculture Rural Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ray v. Rocky Mountain Glass and Tint, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Gary Ray
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Glass and Tint, Inc. , Mark Robinson and Dan Griggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peek v. Allbaugh et al
as 5:2016cv01404
Plaintiff:
Jerome Peek
Defendant:
Joe M Allbaugh, Hector A Rios, Jr, GEO Group Corrections Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dan Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daugomah v. Roberts et al
as 5:2016cv01045
Plaintiff:
John Daugomah
Defendant:
Larry Roberts , Dan Deerinwater , Jessie Durham and others
Intervenor:
Joe E Poe, Jr , Charles Eisenberger and Mary Helen Deer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
