Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Schol et al v. Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund et al
as 2:2011cv00537
Plaintiff:
Joseph Altamore, Michael D'Antonio, Brian K. Fowler, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund, Steven V. Bertelli, Richard B. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
William Brandow, Jr. v. John Baldwin, et al
as 11-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Stephen Brandow, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Director, Dan Craig, Warden, Harbans Deol, Doctor and others
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Sheryl Lockwood, Dan Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jerry Bartruff, Dan Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Dan Craig, Sheryl Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandow v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00333
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Brandow, Jr.
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Dan Craig, Harbons Deol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Ort et al
as 4:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jerry Leroy Hansen
Defendant:
Greg Ort, Dan Craig, Becky Schnieder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Ort et al
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Leroy Hansen
Defendant:
Greg Ort, Dan Craig, Becky Schnieder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartsfield v. Craig
as 1:2009cv00146
Petitioner:
Napoleon Hartsfield
Respondent:
Dan Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartsfield v. Craig
as 4:2009cv00342
Petitioner:
Napoleon Hartsfield
Respondent:
Dan Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
