Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Watkins v. LaValley
as 1:2013cv04293
Petitioner:
Dennis Watkins
Respondent:
Thomas LaValley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv03608
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Captain Merchese, Mateo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. LaValley
as 1:2013cv03644
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Thomas LaValley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Hardy
as 1:2013cv03435
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Glenn Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Rojas
as 1:2013cv03433
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Susanna Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. The Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv03267
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections, Merchese, Mateo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. The New York Transit Authority et al
as 1:2013cv03234
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
The New York Transit Authority and Joseph Matarazzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02855
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
The People of The State of New York, John Chananie, Patricia Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Chananie et al
as 1:2013cv02477
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
John Chananie, Patricia Nunez, Thomas Farber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. LaValley et al
as 9:2013cv00265
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Thomas Lavalley and John Doe Lower (F) Block Sergeant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
