Cases 31 - 40 of 86
SEIBERT v. PRECISION CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LP et al
as 1:2018cv00818
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEIBERT
Defendant:
PRECISION CONTRACTING SOLUTIONS, LP, DERRICK SIEBER and STEPHEN C. SIEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. MOON et al
as 1:2018cv00715
Petitioner:
EDWARD F. PARKS
Respondent:
ROBERT MOON, DERRICK CARLESLIE, CHRISTY D. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BETTS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv02254
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BETTS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
XELUP v. WHITE et al
as 1:2017cv02048
Plaintiff:
TUSHKAHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
ROBERT TODD WHITE, MARK GERBINO, CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00689
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILLS
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and AVERY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLS v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HILLS
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS and JEFF ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STORMS v. SHINSEKI et al
as 1:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
DERRICK STORMS
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, JOSE D. RIOJAS, KEVIN SECOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
XELUP v. WHITE et al
as 1:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
TUSHKAHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
ROBERT TODD WHITE, MARK GERBINO, CHEROKEE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv02026
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01997
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF ALABAMA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
