Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Bowers v. Thurmer et al
as 2:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Thurmer, Don Strahota, Michael Meisener and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Norwood v. Thurmer et al
as 3:2009cv00738
Plaintiff:
Charles Norwood
Defendant:
Mike Thurmer, DON STRAHOTA, Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darren Morris v. Phillip Kingston, et al
as 09-3361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN D. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP A. KINGSTON, Warden, STEVEN SCHUELER, BRUCE A. SIEDSCHLAG and others
Darren Morris v. Phillip Kingston, et al
as 09-3326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN D. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP A. KINGSTON, Warden, STEVEN SCHUELER, BRUCE A. SIEDSCHLAG and others
Bowers v. Pollard et al
as 1:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
William Pollard, Peter Ericksen, Mark Lesatz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowers v. Pollard et al
as 3:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Defendant:
William Pollard, Peter Ericksen, Mark Lesatz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Frank et al
as 2:2009cv00079
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Brown
Defendant:
Matthew J Frank, Dan Westfield, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jesus Broadie v. Don Strahota, et al
as 08-3834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS R. BROADIE
Defendant - Appellee:
DON STRAHOTA, MICHAEL THRUMER and MICHAEL MEISNER
Vasquez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Adult Institutions et al
as 2:2008cv00934
Plaintiff:
Luis Vasquez
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Adult Institutions, John Bett, Dan Westfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matz v. FRANK et al
as 3:2008cv00491
Plaintiff:
Shaun Matz
Defendant:
MATTHEW FRANK, MATTHEW FRANK, DAN WESTFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
