Cases 31 - 40 of 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ADOCIA S.A.
as 1:2018cv03133
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
ADOCIA S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
CIPLA LIMITED v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, et al.
as 1:2018cv01671
Plaintiff:
CIPLA LIMITED and CIPLA USA, INC.
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ICOS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. APOTEX, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01037
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00596
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. ACTAVIS LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04299
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. APOTEX, INC.
as 1:2017cv02865
Defendant:
APOTEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 1:2017cv02772
Defendant:
EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. BIOCON LIMITED
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Defendant:
BIOCON LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
