Cases 31 - 40 of 165
EVANS v. KASUL et al
as 1:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
J. MILLER EVANS
Defendant:
BRYAN KASUL, WASHINGTON DC USA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APONTE v. PANFIL
as 1:2020cv03798
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA APONTE
Defendant:
EVAN J. PANFIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTHSCHILD BROADCASTING LLC v. LAW OFFICES OF EVAN D. CARB PLLC et al
as 1:2020cv02794
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF EVAN D. CARB PLLC, EVAN D. CARB, ESQ. and EVAN D. CARB
Plaintiff:
ROTHSCHILD BROADCASTING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIBERTY v. USA
as 1:2020cv02744
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
EVAN SHAWN LIBERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GAHR v. KESHER ISRAEL BOARD OF DIRECTORS et al
as 1:2020cv01219
Defendant:
AARON KEYAK, ANDREW COOPER, STEVE RABINOWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN GAHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv01033
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
BONNIE JEAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAHR v. SAPERSTEIN et al
as 1:2020cv00964
Defendant:
KARL ROVE, HUDSON INSTITUTE, JAY LEFKOWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN GAHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER et al v. CAPPER SENIOR I, LP et al
as 1:2020mc00012
Plaintiff:
CARL BECKWITH, FRANKLIN BROWN, CAROLYN EAVES-GOFF and others
Defendant:
CAPPER SENIOR I GP, LLC, FOREST CITY CAPPER/CAROLLSBURG, INC., FC CAPPER SENIOR I, LLC and others
DALLAS SAFARI CLUB et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2019cv03696
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Lindo, Jr., Atlas Cheek, III, DALLAS SAFARI CLUB and others
Defendant:
Margaret Everson, United States Fish & Wildlife Service and David Bernhardt
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
