Cases 31 - 40 of 488
Pate v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salazar v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Anselmo Salazar
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sills v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Robert Sills
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chavez v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
as 3:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI La Tuna, FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez Zapata v. Warden FCI La Tuna - FBOP
as 3:2023cv00471
Petitioner:
Manuel Martinez Zapata
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna - FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Bishop, et al
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hernandez
Defendant:
Travis Bishop, RN Kaitlin White, BSN Ariel Vellejos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2023cv00462
Petitioner:
Ryan Graves
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coker v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Spencer Lee Coker
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kafeiti v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Charles Kafeiti
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gerrans v. Warden, FCI La Tuna, F.B.O.P.
as 3:2023cv00451
Petitioner:
Lawrence J. Gerrans
Defendant:
Warden, FCI La Tuna, F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
