Cases 31 - 40 of 45
WOODS v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv03874
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WOODS
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , JASON STETSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINGATE v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv01592
Plaintiff:
VINSON WINGATE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , LUIS SANCHEZ and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIBSON v. ARTHUR et al
as 1:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. GIBSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR, JASON STETSER, MAURICE S. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAYLOR v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. TRAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , CAMDEN CITY POLICE OFFICER JASON STETSER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COTTLE v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COTTLE
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PITTS v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00656
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PITTS
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, DAN MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWBER v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE LOWBER
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSSEL v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE RUSSELL
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELDS v. PARRY et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SHIELDS
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
