Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Smith v. Comfort Suites et al
as 3:2019cv00597
Defendant:
Marone, Adven Medical, Florida Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carilion Medical Center, 15cv192, Tarpon Springs Hospital Foundation, Inc., 15cv192, Southwest Volusia Healthcare Corporation, 15cv192 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Southlake Specialty Hospital, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Rockwall Regional Center, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Rockwall, Flower Mound Hospital Partners, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cherry v. CHS Community Health Systems, Inc.
as 8:2018cv02630
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Cherry
Defendant:
CHS Community Health Systems, Inc., FLORIDA HOSPITAL DADE CITY, INC., HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL et al v. HARGAN
as 1:2017cv02683
Plaintiff:
ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM GEORGIA, INC. and others
Defendant:
ERIC D. HARGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Haile et al v. Bombulie et al
as 2:2017cv14332
Plaintiff:
John Jay Haile , Sr. and J. Haile , Jr.
Defendant:
J. Bombulie, R. Camp-Becl, Family Medical, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
