Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Floyd v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2012cv01323
Petitioner:
Larry Dale Floyd
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe , Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Floyd v. Clemens et al
as 1:2012cv00973
Petitioner:
Larry Dale Floyd
Respondent:
Tom Clemens and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC v. Jude's Barbershop, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02688
Plaintiff:
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jude's Barbershop, Inc. , Jude's Barbershop- Ottawa, Inc. , Jude's Barbershop- Cascade, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Roemer v. Capistrant et al
as 1:2011cv02567
Plaintiff:
Pierre D. Roemer
Defendant:
Floyd Capistrant, Floyd (I) Capistrant, John (I) Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. PDB Sports, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv01476
Plaintiff:
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
PDB Sports, Ltd., Edwin Smith, Floyd Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yeomans v. Wands
as 1:2010cv01036
Petitioner:
Brett Floyd Yeomans
Respondent:
J. Wands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Floyd et al, vs. Ricketts, et al
as 1:1981cv01754
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Floyd , Ernest L. Walker , Harold Turman and others
Defendant:
James G. Ricketts and Colorado Department of Corrections
Interested_party:
Justin Rueb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Floyd v. Wiley
as 1:2009cv01745
Petitioner:
Robert L. Floyd
Respondent:
R. Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pineda v. Keyes et al
as 1:2009cv01596
Plaintiff:
Floyde W. Pineda
Defendant:
Jim Keyes and Chuck Fernell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
